Testing for SARS-CoV-2 is central to the whole coronavirus plandemic. It’s through testing that the manipulated numbers are created and by which a lot of companies are making a lot of money.
Testing goes up… infection rates go up… people make money.
What’s really incredible is that the testing itself is flawed so who really knows what the real numbers are. The current testing methods of SARS-CoV-2 is worthless. For example, there is about a 95% false positive rate with the PCR tests.
Much like the common flu, those infected with the virus may be asymptomatic or develop flu-like symptoms, including fever, cough, fatigue, and shortness of breath. That was the criteria used by medical professionals to first diagnose Covid-19 and trigger further testing using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) from a nasopharyngeal swab.
On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten, along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charite Hospital, along with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study claiming to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus identified first only days before in Wuhan. The Drosten article was titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020). [Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany. False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test]
Since then the Drosten-backed test for the virus, called a real-time or RT-PCR test, has spread via WHO worldwide, as the most used test protocol to determine if a person might have COVID-19, the illness. This, despite the fact the paper published by Drosten was NEVER peer reviewed.
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a laboratory technique combining reverse transcription of RNA into DNA and amplification of specific DNA targets using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). It is primarily used to measure the amount of a specific RNA.
The PCR virus test kits used internationally may in some cases produce false positive and false negative results or react to non-infectious virus fragments from a previous infection. In this regard, the so-called cycle threshold or ct value is an important parameter. The maximum reasonably reliable Ct value is 30 cycles. Above a Ct of 35 cycles, rapidly increasing numbers of false positives must be expected… scientific studies show that only non-infectious (dead) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35. The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles. Is it any wonder why there are so many positives?
If they were to follow the protocol of 35 cycles or less, the number of corona positive would be only less than 3% the present number!
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
In other words, a positive test doesn’t guarantee that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is causing infection at all, and maybe the SARS-CoV-2 virus might not be in the patient’s body at all.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman says he does not believe the Covid-19 virus exists. He points out what scientists are seeing with their testing are exosomes that have the identical appearance of a virus and is a natural part of our immune system. They have NEVER isolated and purified the virus we call Covid-19 and using the RT-PCR testing methods described above found that we all have genetic material (exosomes) in our bodies that when sufficiently amplified will reveal what appears to be coronavirus.
Kary Mullis, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test currently being used to detect COVID-19, said PCR tests cannot detect free infectious viruses at all.
PCR TEST DISCONTINUED
Follow the money…
Dr. Christian Drosten and co-author Dr. Chantal Reusken of the paper launching the PCR testing turns out to also be members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance – a glaring conflict of interest that was not disclosed. Another co-author of the Drosten paper that gave a cover of apparent scientific credibility to the Drosten PCR procedure was head of the company who developed the test being marketed today, with the blessing of WHO, in the hundreds of millions, Olfert Landt, of Tib-Molbiol in Berlin, but Landt did not disclose that pertinent fact in the Drosten paper either. Certainly nothing suspicious or improper here, or?
The Biden administration recently awarded an Australian-based company $230 million to scale up the manufacturing of its at-home Covid test. This test claims to be 95 per cent accurate and provided users with Covid-19 results within 15 minutes. The test should be offered over the counter at $30 per kit and sends the results to one’s phone. Interestingly, the products fact sheet provided to the FDA says that a positive result in a asymptomatic individual is only presumptive and may need to be confirmed with a molecular assay. Negative results are presumptive and confirmation with a molecular assay may be needed. Your test results will automatically be reported to relevant public health authorities.
Professor Dolores Cahill of the Freedom Airway & Freedom Travel Alliance is seeking to create travel options that don’t require travelers to submit to vaccination, face masks or quarantines. She outlines some pretty good solutions for pushing back. Watch the full interview here… https://www.corbettreport.com/freedom-airway-solutionswatch/