The 2013–2015 Ebola virus is one of the worst outbreaks to date. The virus left its country of origin and spread to other countries including the heavily populated area of Nigeria. Many deaths have been reported there.
The public is being assured that the risk of the Ebola virus becoming a significant threat in more countries is minimal. They’re saying this because the government claims the virus is only contagious through contact with body fluids.
However, the Ebola virus is somewhat airborne now, even though it’s officially listed as non airborne. Is it possible the government is not calling the virus one that’s airborne because they don’t want to start a widespread panic?
The official government position is that Ebola does not spread through the “airborne route,” but in truth can spread through the “droplet route”. In other words, it can be spread from person to person whether or not you ever touch that person – as long as you come in contact with their body fluids, such as a sneeze or cough that gets on you.
If the virus isn’t airborne, why do doctors and nurses need to wear full protective suits, with face masks, while treating patients?
The fake news media isn’t reporting that there were concerns back in 2012 that Ebola could easily be passed from animals to humans because of respiratory droplets in the air.
Scientists like Michael T. Osterholm suggest it’s possible for the virus to become airborne. “It is very likely that at least some degree of Ebola virus transmission currently occurs via infectious aerosols generated from the gastrointestinal tract, the respiratory tract, or medical procedures, although this has been difficult to definitively demonstrate or rule out, since those exposed to infectious aerosols also are most likely to be in close proximity to, and in direct contact with, an infected case,” the scientists wrote. Their peer-reviewed analysis was published in mBio, a journal of the American Society of Microbiology.
William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt Medical Center who did not take part in the study, said he could imagine the possibility of respiratory transmission of Ebola from close-in contact, perhaps a distance of three or four feet. Even so, he said, it would be rare; as the study points out, it has never been demonstrated in humans. The common mode of transmission — contact with body fluids — “those are the highways of transmission. Could respiratory transmission occur? Yes. But it’s probably a byway, a little trail in the forest.”
Yet another study in the New England Journal of Medicine raised concerns that you’re also not being told that this Ebola outbreak has been difficult to restrain and stop because it’s not the same old strain that’s been treated before.
A study, published in the journal Cell has shown that ebola has mutated. It’s genes have altered, with a C gene becoming a T, which has made the disease even more infectious. This has caused massive problems and made it more difficult to control.
You’re also not being told is that you can be fine for up to three weeks without showing signs after catching the virus. You could walk around, interact with colleagues and your family, share a sip of a friend’s drink, cough into your hand and shake someone else’s hand and spread the virus. That also means that other people doing the exact same actions can spread it to you.
The government is not being upfront about how great the risk is that Ebola is already incubating in people in your area – especially with the illegal aliens pouring through the border and international flights posing a strong risk.
The virus has already proven that it can go where it wants to go thanks to air travel. What the government is telling you is that passengers exhibiting signs of the virus get off the flight and are immediately quarantined at the airport.
What they’re not telling you is that the passengers who’ve been to the area where the Ebola virus is so prevalent but aren’t showing any signs of the having it are free to continue on their way.
While the government is downplaying the Ebola risks, those in the hot zone know how high those risks are. Borders near the country of origin have been closed in an attempt to keep the virus from spreading between countries.
Yet the government continues to downplay the risks of widespread Ebola from air travel. The truth is that the government knows a lot more about the dangers of this virus than they’re saying.
Closing the borders and halting international air travel would hurt the economy, so the last move the government wants to make is to affect the country economically.
While I can’t say with 100% certainty that we are at risk of contracting the Ebola virus, I think there is ample evidence that the mainstream fake news media and government officials have not told us the whole truth about this virus. WHO recently said the risk of Ebola are being underestimated. But it’s not worth the risk to your family – so even if the government isn’t being upfront about the risks, protect yourself despite their assurances.
The Origins of the Ebola Virus
Dr. Cyril Broderick, a former professor of plant pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry, claims that the Ebola virus which recently ran rampant in Western Africa was genetically modified, made in a lab by Western pharmaceutical companies, and administered to unsuspecting civilians through United Nations vaccination programs.
Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz is the world’s most prolific, best credential, and most controversial drug industry whistleblower.