This New World Order is anticipated with hope by an elite few operating in the shadows of history and far from public view.
While these insider power-brokers have avoided the spotlights, others have been thrust to the forefront of the world stage to evangelize the world with its message of planetary survival and has been heralded by a multitude from among the world’s most esteemed and renowned leaders in every field.
One of their primary strategies for bringing about the new world order is a process known as the Hegelian dialectic, or what has been called Problem-Reaction-Solution. The plan of the global elites to set up their New World Order is to first create a series of problems (or crises) followed by a predictable reaction of the population demanding a solution, and then setting up a global scientific dictatorship to provide the solution.
Understanding this strategy is key to understanding the New World Order. “The greatest threat to elites at any time – historically and presently – is an awakened, critically thinking and politically stimulated populace. “[New Eugenics and the Rise of the Global Scientific Dictatorship] If we are to defeat the powers pushing for a New World Order, we must first be aware of their tactics so we don’t fall prey to them and then respond to their efforts with the truth.
B.F. Skinner says repeatedly that we cannot be saved without turning ourselves over to controllers who will condition us to act in ways that are conducive to survival.
Robert Heilbroner says that only obedience to the political powers can save us. [Herbert Schlossberg, Idols For Destruction, pg. 181.]
The greatest triumphs of the mind have arisen out of and challenged great systems of power and control. This is why I have suggested these practical steps Christians can take to resist the New World Order.
The arguments calling for a New World Order are formidable.
Salvation from Disaster
It seems that hardly a day passes without news of some impending disaster or crisis. And who better to ensure that “it never happens again,” than some new government policy, organization, or law.
The word “survival” is never far from the lips of those who wish to impose state power in order to protect us from disaster, named or unnamed.
One of the most compelling arguments for a new world order is the danger of global annihilation.
The threat of war, especially atomic war, would cause those who have only the values of personal peace and prosperity to be ready for almost any kind of authoritarian government which would be able to remove the threat of war, particularly if (as Augustus did in ancient Rome) it was brought in while seemingly keeping the outward forms of constitutionality.
Those who push this argument are at the forefront of global disarmament and a one-world “peace-keeping” military force, namely the United Nations.
Based on my understanding of world history, wars have been going on since man was removed from the garden. And Jesus told us there will be wars and rumors of wars right up until the end [Matthew 24:6]. Now, I’m not a proponent of war, but a realist who understands that fallen man has always used violence and war to impose it’s will on others. I don’t expect war will ever be eliminated, but suspect those operating in the spirit of the antichrist might make false promises of eliminating wars and establishing world peace.
Peace, Safety, and Security
While people are saying, “Peace and safety,” destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. – 1 Thessalonians 5:3
The Price of Security
To move the world along in its march to a New World Order, another price needed to be paid. It was a price that America’s first president, George Washington spoke of in his farewell address. He said,
“Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing, with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied, as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view, that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character.”
Washington made a point: America was a free, united country that should not be quick to dispense with it’s independence.
Through the years, our independence, liberty, and freedom’s have been chipped away bit-by-bit by an ever increasing tyrannical state. By the time George W. Bush came into power, the next incremental step necessary to accomplish the global collectivist transformation was to convince the American people that it was necessary they abandon the freedoms they were accustomed to in exchange for perceived security.
A year later, thanks to a group of CIA funded and trained operatives, Mr. Bush got his New Pearl Harbor ushering in a period of de facto martial law and perpetual war where the American Constitution was shredded while Americans were told resistance was futile.
Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, “Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” Today, those words ring truer than ever as Americans are willingly giving up their freedom in order to gain a “perceived” security.
Sadly, we will have neither as America collapses into the ash heap of history.
President Washington also warned in his farewell address… “As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is, to use it as sparingly as possible; avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of peace to discharge the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen, which we ourselves ought to bear.”
This was the price to be paid as Pastor Chuck Baldwin said in his speech, What Every Christian Should Know about the New World Order, “…Perpetual war is a tool of globalists to enslave us.
Perpetual war demands two things:
- It demands that nations go into debt. In order to finance perpetual war you must spend and spend and spend more than you have coming in.
- In the name of war, in the name of security, in the name of we are at war, people will accept abridgements to their liberties and to their freedoms that they would never accept in a time of peace.”
Claiming victory in this perpetual war is NOT part of the agenda.
In 1959, for example, Joseph E. Johnson, a planner in the U.S. State Department, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and inaugural American secretary of the annual Bilderberg conference stated that, “From now on, every decision facing the United States in this field must be taken in the light of the fact that a good part of this country could be destroyed …We must be prepared to fight limited wars, limited as to weapons and as to goals, to stabilize the situation temporarily, tide things over. But victory is no longer possible.”
Their strategy is ordo ab chao (Latin for “out of chaos, comes order”) – one of the oldest mottos of Craft Freemasonry. As retired United States Marine Corps Major General Smedley D. Butler said, War Is A Racket. It’s perpetual qualities are profitable to the ruling elite who seem to always profit. After-all, they are supporting and financing both sides in the conflict.
Following a series of events orchestrated to coerce Americans to freely give up their Constitutional Rights…
- On January 24, 2003, President George W. Bush created the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to more effectively control public opinion through fear and intimidation and to control the free movement of American citizens.
- USA PATRIOT Act gives BIG government far-reaching access into the private lives of Americans, including their financial records, Internet surfing habits and email, telephone records, business records, access to public transportation, and even surveillance of the drugs you’re taking.
- Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorist Prevention Act of 2007 criminalizes American citizens who exercise their Constitutional right of dissent.
“There is the ecological argument of Greenpeace, The Club of Rome, and other groups stating that mankind has come of age – that now we must be planetary stewards of the earth’s ecology before the world’s ecosystem is irreversibly damaged from industrial pollution by selfish nations who are accountable to none but whose irresponsibility directly affects the lives of other nations.” (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 9)
Pope Francis made a strong new push for globalism in 2019, calling for a supranational, legally constituted body to enforce United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and implement “climate change” policies. Speaking to members of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences in the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace, the Pope said: “When a supranational common good is clearly identified, there is need for a special legally constituted authority capable of facilitating its implementation.”
The Pope is addressing the increasing awareness that the problems of external security which are facing their national governments are problems facing the world today – ozone depletion, air pollution, acid rain, nuclear accidents, over-population, drought, famine, international terrorism, human trafficking, international trading, multinational corporation, international communications, etc. – cannot be controlled or solved by individual national governments. So he is looking beyond national governments to a higher denomination of government – a world government with legislative, enforcement, and judicial influence on a world scale.
“In the current situation of globalization not only of the economy but also of technological and cultural exchanges, the nation state is no longer able to procure the common good of its population alone,” Pope Francis told the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences in 2019. “The common good has become global and nations must associate for their own benefit,” Francis said. The pope called “building the common good of humanity, a necessary and essential element for the world balance.”
In 2015, Catholic Pope Francis called for the creation of “a new economic and ecological world order where the goods of the Earth are shared by everyone, not just exploited by the rich.”
There are people that want to transform America and put our problems into the hands of the rest of the world. These people have mastered the art of hiding it in plain sight and then just dismissing it as a joke…such is the case with Agenda 21.
Agenda 21 explained on the Glenn Beck Show
The second Humanist Manifesto declares that we cannot survive without “bold and daring” measures, by which it means collectivist ones.
“There is the economic call for globalism. Virtually every major name in banking from Rockefeller to Rothschild to Robert McNamara (president of The World Bank) has spoken of the reality of an interlocking global economy – that what happens on Wall Street one minute is felt in London or Tokyo the next, that the complex jigsaw puzzle of world economy is moving into an oscillating ball that will eventually unify nations and currencies in the global marketplace, and that the economic forces of the earth are moving relentlessly toward a unified world system.” (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 11.)
It was these global bankers who orchestrated the banking crisis that swept the planet in recent years. In 2008, the world experienced a global manipulation of economies by a global elite pushing sovereign governments toward a global banking system with complete control of their financial systems.
There are the social and political voices talking about the unfair distribution of wealth and resources – that a global system of sharing and redistribution could remedy the social problems of cross-national envy, and that if this were addressed, a major component of international strife and war would be removed forever. These voices led America to elect a Marxist inspired president who claimed it was good to “share the wealth.” Once in power, he filled his government with one world government advocates at every level of his administration.
The Global Village
“There is the “global village” argument of Marshall McLuhan – that modern technology has altered the landscape of the earth, and that what were once great natural barriers of distance, thought, and language have been collapsed by the myriad jets and airwaves filling the sky and the Information Superhighway.” (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 10.)
To help complacent Americans accept the new government intrusions, Clinton, Bush, and Obama propagandists instilled fear of just about every crisis they could conjure up.
The buzzword of the nineties was “crisis.” We were told we had a health care “crisis” – justifying the government takeover of one-seventh of the U.S. economy. We were told we had a ecological “crisis” – justifying the government to impose far reaching new regulations on businesses. We were told we had a child care “crisis” – justifying the government to extend its reach into the family.
“It takes more than a family to raise children.” [Hillary Clinton]
Hillary Clinton said in her speech at the 1996 Democratic Convention her belief that children should be raised by a “village.”
Hillary Clinton argues, “Children should have a right to be permitted to decide their own future if they are competent.” “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect the child’s future should not be made unilaterally by parents.”
The Clinton’s not only redefined the family but they created an Orwellian euphemism for bureaucracy to replace it.
Hillary Clinton chaired the New World Foundation 1987-88, ranked by the Capitol Research Center as “one of the ten most liberal foundations in the United States.” From 1986-92 she chaired the Children’s Defense Fund (CDF), which promotes an amoral approach to sex education and other means of destroying the very moral values which most parents want to pass on to their children. The CDF agrees with the Clinton’s and wants to redefine the family believing government can serve as surrogate parents (the “village”). That means that kids would no longer be primarily accountable to their parents. To whom would they be accountable to? The answer, of course, is the state. The benevolent state. The “VILLAGE,” then, would transcend the Orwellian “Big Brother” role and become surrogate parent. It would grant your children “rights” and be their legal guardian.
Authoritarian and totalitarian regimes – be they fascist or communist in nature – have always sought to destroy the traditional family unit by severing the bonds between parents and their children, thereby increasing the power of the government. Quite simply, Donna Shalala, Hillary Rodham, and other modern statists believe they can raise your children better than you can. That’s what they mean by “children’s rights” – the rights of children to be liberated from the shackles of their evil parents.
Believing that it takes more than a family to raise children, Clinton’s Big Government, “Village”, turned the rhetoric to focus on Children. In almost every speech, on about any topic, in just about any context, Bill Clinton used that “powerful” emotion-filled statement, “for the children.”
What they really meant is for parents to give government more of their income so that big wasteful government programs can continue. They speak of supporting the family but what they support is a kinder and gentler way of destroying the traditional family and raising up a village or commune that is in tune with their distorted vision of the new millennium.