This New World Order is anticipated with hope by an elite few operating in the shadows of history and far from public view.
While these insider power-brokers have avoided the spotlights, others have been thrust to the forefront of the world stage to evangelize the world with its message of planetary survival and has been heralded by a multitude from among the world’s most esteemed and renowned leaders in every field.
One of their primary strategies for bringing about the new world order is a process known as the Hegelian dialectic, or what has been called Problem-Reaction-Solution. The plan of the global elites to set up their New World Order is to first create a series of problems (or crises) followed by a predictable reaction of the population demanding a solution, and then setting up a global scientific dictatorship to provide the solution.
Understanding this strategy is key to understanding the New World Order. “The greatest threat to elites at any time – historically and presently – is an awakened, critically thinking and politically stimulated populace. “[New Eugenics and the Rise of the Global Scientific Dictatorship] If we are to defeat the powers pushing for a New World Order, we must first be aware of their tactics so we don’t fall prey to them and then respond to their efforts with the truth.
B.F. Skinner says repeatedly that we cannot be saved without turning ourselves over to controllers who will condition us to act in ways that are conducive to survival.
Robert Heilbroner says that only obedience to the political powers can save us. [Herbert Schlossberg, Idols For Destruction, pg. 181.]
The greatest triumphs of the mind have arisen out of and challenged great systems of power and control. This is why I have suggested these practical steps Christians can take to resist the New World Order.
The arguments calling for a New World Order are formidable.
Salvation from Disaster
It seems that hardly a day passes without news of some impending disaster or crisis. And who better to ensure that “it never happens again,” than some new government policy, organization, or law.
The word “survival” is never far from the lips of those who wish to impose state power in order to protect us from disaster, named or unnamed.
Barack Obama: The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing
Those who can be convinced that survival is at stake are likely to agree to almost any remedy, since extinction seems worse than all the alternatives. If placing extraordinary powers in the hands of political leaders will truly stave off the ultimate disaster, then those who demur can be made to appear as enemies of the human race. That is why arguments based on survival are so effective in persuading people to permit actions that violate their moral code. [Herbert Schlossberg, Idols For Destruction, pp. 180-181.]
One of the most compelling arguments for a new world order is the danger of global annihilation.
The threat of war, especially atomic war, would cause those who have only the values of personal peace and prosperity to be ready for almost any kind of authoritarian government which would be able to remove the threat of war, particularly if (as Augustus did in ancient Rome) it was brought in while seemingly keeping the outward forms of constitutionality.
Those who push this argument are at the forefront of global disarmament and a one-world “peace-keeping” military force, namely the United Nations.
The Second Vatican Council (Gaudium et Spes) declared, “It is our clear duty, therefore, to strain every muscle in working for the time when all war can be completely outlawed by international consent. This goal undoubtedly requires the establishment of some universal public authority acknowledged as such by all and endowed with the power to safeguard on the behalf of all, security, regard for justice, and respect for rights. But before this hoped for authority can be set up, the highest existing international centers must devote themselves vigorously to the pursuit of better means for obtaining common security.”
Pope Paul VI wrote in the Encyclical titled, POPULORUM PROGRESSIO, in a section called “Toward an Effective World Authority,” Such international collaboration among the nations of the world certainly calls for institutions that will promote, coordinate and direct it, until a new juridical order is firmly established and fully ratified. We give willing and wholehearted support to those public organizations that have already joined in promoting the development of nations, and We ardently hope that they will enjoy ever growing authority. As We told the United Nations General Assembly in New York: “Your vocation is to bring not just some peoples but all peoples together as brothers. . . Who can fail to see the need and importance of thus gradually coming to the establishment of a world authority capable of taking effective action on the juridical and political planes?
Based on my understanding of world history, wars have been going on since man was removed from the garden. And Jesus told us there will be wars and rumors of wars right up until the end [Matthew 24:6]. Now, I’m not a proponent of war, but a realist who understands that fallen man has always used violence and war to impose it’s will on others. I don’t expect war will ever be eliminated, but suspect those operating in the spirit of the antichrist might make false promises of eliminating wars.
Following a series of events orchestrated to coerce Americans to freely give up their Constitutional Rights…
- On January 24, 2003, President George W. Bush created the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to more effectively control public opinion through fear and intimidation and to control the free movement of American citizens.
- USA PATRIOT Act gives BIG government far-reaching access into the private lives of Americans, including their financial records, Internet surfing habits and email, telephone records, business records, access to public transportation, and even surveillance of the drugs you’re taking.
- Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorist Prevention Act of 2007 criminalizes American citizens who exercise their Constitutional right of dissent.
“There is the ecological argument of Greenpeace, The Club of Rome, and other groups stating that mankind has come of age – that now we must be planetary stewards of the earth’s ecology before the world’s ecosystem is irreversibly damaged from industrial pollution by selfish nations who are accountable to none but whose irresponsibility directly affects the lives of other nations.” (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 9)
>In 2015, Catholic Pope Francis called for the creation of “a new economic and ecological world order where the goods of the Earth are shared by everyone, not just exploited by the rich.” The pontiff recently wrote an encyclical to the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics asking them to support larger government to stop “global warming.”
People have been becoming increasingly aware that the problems of external security which are facing their national governments are problems facing the world today – ozone depletion, air pollution, acid rain, nuclear accidents, over-population, drought, famine, international terrorism, international trading, multinational corporation, international communications, etc. – cannot be controlled or solved by individual national governments. So men are beginning to look beyond their national governments to a higher denomination of government – a world government with legislative, enforcement, and judicial influence on a world scale.
Agenda 21 For Dummies
Agenda 21 is an action plan of the United Nations (UN) related to sustainable development and was an outcome of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is a comprehensive blueprint of action to be taken globally, nationally, and locally by organizations of the UN, governments, and major groups in every area in which humans directly affect the environment.
Agenda 21 explained on the Glenn Beck Show
There are people that want to transform America and put our problems into the hands of the rest of the world. These people have mastered the art of hiding it in plain sight and then just dismissing it as a joke…such is the case with Agenda 21.
Global Scientific Dictatorship
Andrew Gavin Marshall writes, “For the first time in human history, free humanity is faced with the dominating threat of a truly global elite, who have at their hands the technology to impose a truly global system of control: a global scientific dictatorship. The great danger is that through the exponential growth in scientific techniques, elites will use these great new powers to control and dominate all of humanity in such a way that has never before been experienced.” [New Eugenics and the Rise of the Global Scientific Dictatorship]
Transhumanism: Should We Merge With Machines?
An international, intellectual, and fast-growing cultural movement known as transhumanism intends the use of genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotechnology as tools that will radically redesign our minds, our memories, our physiology, our offspring, and even perhaps—as Joel Garreau in his best-selling book, Radical Evolution, claims—our very souls.
The second Humanist Manifesto declares that we cannot survive without “bold and daring” measures, by which it means collectivist ones.
“There is the economic call for globalism. Virtually every major name in banking from Rockefeller to Rothschild to Robert McNamara (president of The World Bank) has spoken of the reality of an interlocking global economy – that what happens on Wall Street one minute is felt in London or Tokyo the next, that the complex jigsaw puzzle of world economy is moving into an oscillating ball that will eventually unify nations and currencies in the global marketplace, and that the economic forces of the earth are moving relentlessly toward a unified world system.” (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 11.)
It was these global bankers who orchestrated the banking crisis that swept the planet in recent years. In 2008, the world experienced a global manipulation of economies by a global elite pushing sovereign governments toward a global banking system with complete control of their financial systems.
There are the social and political voices talking about the unfair distribution of wealth and resources – that a global system of sharing and redistribution could remedy the social problems of cross-national envy, and that if this were addressed, a major component of international strife and war would be removed forever. These voices led America to elect a Marxist inspired president who claimed it was good to “share the wealth.” Once in power, he filled his government with one world government advocates at every level of his administration.
The Global Village
“There is the “global village” argument of Marshall McLuhan – that modern technology has altered the landscape of the earth, and that what were once great natural barriers of distance, thought, and language have been collapsed by the myriad jets and airwaves filling the sky and the Information Superhighway.” (Tal Brooke, When The World Will Be As One, pg. 10.)
To help complacent Americans accept the new government intrusions, Clinton, Bush, and Obama propagandists instilled fear of just about every crisis they could conjure up.
The buzzword of the nineties was “crisis.” We were told we had a health care “crisis” – justifying the government takeover of one-seventh of the U.S. economy. We were told we had a ecological “crisis” – justifying the government to impose far reaching new regulations on businesses. We were told we had a child care “crisis” – justifying the government to extend its reach into the family.
“It takes more than a family to raise children.” [Hillary Clinton]
Hillary Clinton said in her speech at the 1996 Democratic Convention her belief that children should be raised by a “village.”
Hillary Clinton argues, “Children should have a right to be permitted to decide their own future if they are competent.” “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect the child’s future should not be made unilatrally by parents.”
The Clinton’s not only redefined the family but they created an Orwellian euphemism for bureaucracy to replace it.
Hillary Clinton chaired the New World Foundation 1987-88, ranked by the Capitol Research Center as “one of the ten most liberal foundations in the United States.” From 1986-92 she chaired the Children’s Defense Fund (CDF), which promotes an amoral approach to sex education and other means of destroying the very moral values which most parents want to pass on to their children. The CDF agrees with the Clinton’s and wants to redefine the family believing government can serve as surrogate parents (the “village”). That means that kids would no longer be primarily accountable to their parents. To whom would they be accountable to? The answer, of course, is the state. The benevolent state. The “VILLAGE,” then, would transcend the Orwellian “Big Brother” role and become surrogate parent. It would grant your children “rights” and be their legal guardian.
Authoritarian and totalitarian regimes – be they fascist or communist in nature – have always sought to destroy the traditional family unit by severing the bonds between parents and their children, thereby increasing the power of the government. Quite simply, Donna Shalala, Hillary Rodham, and other modern statists believe they can raise your children better than you can. That’s what they mean by “children’s rights” – the rights of children to be liberated from the shackles of their evil parents.
Believing that it takes more than a family to raise children, Clinton’s Big Government, “Village”, turned the rhetoric to focus on Children. In almost every speech, on about any topic, in just about any context, Bill Clinton used that “powerful” emotion-filled statement, “for the children.”
What they really meant is for parents to give government more of their income so that big wasteful government programs can continue. They speak of supporting the family but what they support is a kinder and gentler way of destroying the traditional family and raising up a village or commune that is in tune with their distorted vision of the new millennium.