Is Covid-19 Coronavirus Real?
Coronavirus (COVID-19) is said to be a novel (new) infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Perhaps the first piece of dis-information we were fed by public health officials and the mainstream media was that Coronavirus was new and we knew very little about it. That little nugget alone was enough to scare millions of people. The fact is, though, Coronavirus is NOT new and we know quite a bit about it.
Human coronaviruses are actually a group of related viruses discovered in the 1960s. The earliest ones studied were from human patients with the common cold, which were later named human coronavirus 229E and human coronavirus OC43. 
Other human coronaviruses have since been identified, including SARS-CoV in 2003, HCoV NL63 in 2004, HKU1 in 2005, MERS-CoV in 2012, and now SARS-CoV-2 in 2019.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded Pirbright Institute holds a patent for a coronavirus that primarily affects chickens, but is not the same as the SARS-CoV-2 causing the current COVID-19 pandemic.
So, yeah… coronavirus in general is real.
I think a better question we need to ask is, “what’s the agenda behind coronavirus?” Is it just a natural phenomena to be overcome or is it a tool being used by somebody with an ulterior motive?
You might also want to ask, “Does the disease justify the response?”
It seems the answer to that question depends on who you ask.
The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, the capital of China’s Hubei province, and has since spread globally, resulting in the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Within months virtually the entire world was locked down. As with many viruses, it was named after it’s geographic origination, i.e., the Wuhan Virus. After China pressured the World Health Organization to not name it after China, WHO changed its name to Covid-19.
As one of his first acts as President of the United States to control thought and speech, Joe Biden issued an executive order banning federal workers from referring to COVID-19 as the “China virus” Some might argue the executive order does not explicitly reference the “China virus”. That’s true. It does, however, talk about how the federal government has “played a role in furthering these xenophobic sentiments [against the AAPI community] through the actions of political leaders, including references to the COVID-19 pandemic by the geographic location of its origin.” That of course referencing Donald Trump favorite term for the virus as the “China virus.”
The memorandum issued by the White House directs federal agencies to do the following:
“Executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall take all appropriate steps to ensure that official actions, documents, and statements, including those that pertain to the COVID-19 pandemic, do not exhibit or contribute to racism, xenophobia, and intolerance against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Agencies may consult with public health experts, AAPI community leaders, or AAPI community-serving organizations, or may refer to any best practices issued pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, to ensure an understanding of the needs and challenges faced by AAPI communities.”
Sounds like an official end for the federal government talking about the geographic origins of the China Virus and a federal designation of people like myself who refer to the China virus as being racist, xenophobic, and intolerant.
1st documentary movie on the origin of CCP virus,
Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus
Although never proven, we were told SARS-CoV-2 originated in the wet markets in Wuhan and specifically from people eating bats where it passed from animal to human. I’ve seen reports, however, that there were no bats being sold in the Wuhan market. If you’ve ever visited one of these wet markets I’m sure you’d conclude they are NOT sanitary places and likely contaminated with all sorts of pathogens. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that people can get sick from eating foods from these markets. Problem is… the wet markets in Wuhan is really a distraction to cover up the real origination of the virus.
More likely, the coronavirus was either intentionally or unintentionally released from the Wuhan Institute of Virology biosafety level 4 lab in Hubei province. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. Bill Gates also funded the Wuhan lab in China, was a member of China’s Academy of Sciences who built the lab and was awarded their highest honor.
Is SARS-CoV-2 Deadly?
I believe to attach the high infection rates and death rates to Covid-19 as public health officials have done is a stretch. Real scientific evidence supports neither the reported infection rates or death rates. In fact, as more testing is conducted around the world, we’re finding vastly more people have been infected with coronavirus and the actual death rates are dramatically lower than projected by the so-called experts.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has since reduced their estimate of the death rate for individuals with COVID-19 symptoms to just 0.26 percent, suggesting the average American’s chances of dying from COVID-19 are extremely small.
Covid Killing the Elderly and Vulnerable
In many Western countries, up to two thirds of all covid deaths have occurred in nursing homes. In some cases, care home residents died not from the coronavirus, but from weeks of stress and isolation.
According to the latest immunological studies, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of covid-19 in the general population is about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, which is comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968. The median age of covid deaths is over 80 years in most Western countries (but 78 in the US) and only about 5% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. In many Western countries, up to two thirds of all covid deaths have occurred in nursing homes, which require targeted and humane protection. In some cases it is not clear whether the residents really died of covid or of weeks of stress and isolation. The age and risk profile of covid mortality is therefore comparable to normal mortality, but increases it proportionally. Why does the mainstream media not report these facts? Why are so many people afraid of this? And, this makes me question WHY Covid is even considered a pandemic? [Facts about Covid-19]
Nearly six out of every 10 people who died with coronavirus in England last year were disabled, figures suggest. Some 30,296 of the 50,888 deaths between January and November were people with a disability, Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows. It also suggests the risk of death is three times greater for more severely disabled people. The ONS figures suggest disabled people were disproportionately affected by the pandemic – accounting for 17.2% of the study population but nearly 60% of coronavirus deaths. [Disabled people account for six in 10 deaths in England last year – ONS]
New York is home to one of the highest nursing home death tolls in the nation, with more than 6,400 deaths in homes and long-term care facilities tied to the virus. New York Attorney General Letitia James released a report about how Governor Cuomo’s office may have undercounted the number of COVID-linked nursing home deaths by more than 50%. According to a report from The Associated Press, more than 9,000 recovering COVID patients in the Empire State were released from hospitals into nursing homes early in the pandemic under a controversial directive from Cuomo’s administration. The Cuomo administration’s March 25 directive barred nursing homes from refusing people just because they had COVID-19. It was intended to free up space in hospitals swamped in the early days of the pandemic.
Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow. – Isaiah 1:17
Personally, I find the treatment of the elderly and vulnerable populations such as the disabled one of the most egregious of the Covid plandemic. These people are being hidden from view and abused by a system that sees them as worthless eaters. They are isolated from family when there is a family to visit them.
When my mother was hospitalized after a stroke and later in a care home, I was heartbroken to discover MOST of the folks in those facilities had no families, nobody to advocate for them. They were forgotten and desperate for human interaction. I can’t tell you how often our family discovered errors in the medical care my mother was given and how often she and others were ignored by a system more motivated by profit than care. Often, they were left to languish alone in their beds or relegated to a place in the hallway to sit for hours in a wheelchair.
Covid has stripped the elderly of what little dignity they have left. If they did have visitors, they were kept apart by social distancing rules. Children were no longer allowed to comfort their their dying parents by holding their hand, stroking their bodies, or speaking comforting words to them. They could only see their parents through a glass window or speak to them on a video call.
Folks, this is NOT right. As a society we need a reset in how we treat the elderly and the vulnerable.
Covid Death Data Analyzed
In November 2020, Dr. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data“.
She analyzed data from the CDC of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared. Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. “The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Dr. Briand said. Duh??? Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
She goes on to say, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. She turned next to deaths by cause with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia. What she found here was quite interesting. When Briand looked at the 2020 data during the seasonal periods when we normally see an increase of deaths due to all causes, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.
Interestingly, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.
Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19.
This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be re-categorized as being due to COVID-19. [Now that’s not new as I and others have been saying this all along.] The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths.
“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.
Covid-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data
What does Dr. Briand’s analysis tell us?
This whole Covid-19 fear campaign is bogus. Tragically, there are some people dying but not in greater numbers than normal, i.e., there is NO pandemic.
Listen to
When the editors of the John’s Hopkins News-Letter, where the article was published, realized that one of it’s people had gone off the reservation and published data contrary to the “official narrative”, they retracted the article to (in their words) “stop the spread of misinformation”. They attempted to discredit her saying, “As assistant director for the Master’s in Applied Economics program at Hopkins, Briand is neither a medical professional nor a disease researcher.” 
She has taught for the Applied Economics Program since summer, 2015, and currently teaches Microeconomic Theory, Statistics, and Econometrics. She has many years of experience teaching numerous and varied economics and statistics courses. Her fields of interest are microeconomics and econometrics. Previously, she was an Instructor at the University of Idaho, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Economics at Washington State University, and a tenured Associate Professor at Eastern Washington University. She received her PhD from Washington State University.
How dare anyone take the actual data from the CDC and conclude anything other that what the official narrative says?
Folks, this is just another example of how we are being played. We’re being lied to by the so-called public health experts and whenever somebody dares to speak the truth, they are shut up and censored. And, even if you don’t accept Dr. Briand’s article as truth, in a free marketplace of ideas and free speech, it deserves to be heard so you have other sides of the issue to make up your own mind. But, that’s not the reality in this post 9/11 and Covid-19 world.
Instead we’re encouraged to embrace pseudo-science and computer modeling projections to inform public health policy and justifying the unprecedented locking down the global economy. If you pay attention to what these fear mongers are telling us is that if we do NOTHING the virus will spread uncontrollably. I suggest the argument is not binary… only one or the other. There are other options that are common sense that can control the spread of the virus. It seems to me the reaction of the world to this pandemic is a massive over-reaction to something that simply does not justify the ends.
DOCTORS GO VIRAL! What No One Else Will Tell You Because They Didn’t Watch The Whole Video!
Mostly ignored by the mainstream media and scrubbed from social media are alternative voices questioning the official narrative.
While I am not an epidemiologist and certainly no expert in infectious disease, I am still capable of critical thinking and can still exhibit some common sense. What I’m hearing from the Whitehouse Coronavirus Task Force and mainstream media makes NO sense.
Although I’m not privy to what is really going on, this much I’m sure of… we’re NOT being told the truth by any official source about the Wuhan coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.
Why?
I suggest before taking any so-called experts word for it, you might want to follow the money trail and see if that expert has some ulterior agenda directing their conclusions.
Both Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauchi have some interesting financial and deep state ties to globalist organizations that should be considered. I believe the most obvious connection is to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation whose agenda is all about vaccines.
.
We’re being told the existing social distancing measures are likely to continue and life won’t get back to normal until a vaccine is developed.
Despite the fact they have not developed a virus for any previous coronavirus, I wouldn’t hold my breath for a Wuhan Covid-19 vaccine. And besides, if Covid-19 doesn’t really exist (the virus has not been isolated), as Dr. Andrew Kaufman suggests, how can you make a vaccine for something never proven to exist?
Given the huge financial incentive for Big Pharma, I wouldn’t be surprised if something shows up in the marketplace… effective or not.
According to the WHO, up to 35 COVID-19 vaccines are in the offing, including experimental messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and formulations that attach coronavirus to genetically modified measles vaccines. At the front of the line is a vaccine thrown together at record speed by Fauci’s NIAID in collaboration with Massachusetts-based biotech firm Moderna. NIAID and Moderna began developing the vaccine before a single COVID-19 case had appeared in the U.S., completing the first batch of vaccine “within 42 days of the company obtaining genetic information on the coronavirus.”
Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines from Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected. [Forbes]
What’s Behind the Covid-19 Scare?
It’s really too early at this point to identify the real story behind the Covid-19 pandemic scare. Like so many things it will be months, years, or even decades before we know the real truth.
- Some have suggested Covid-19 might be a bio-weapon used by Communist China to bring down the world economy, opening the way for them to invade and dominate the world.
- Others suggest SARS-CoV-2 has been weaponized by globalists wanting to reduce global population.
- Some suggest the entire manufactured coronavirus campaign has been a psy-op to control you and I.
- Perhaps it’s a tool to bring about forced vaccine inoculations or immunity passports.
- Some hold to the belief this is just another virus, not too unlike many others present in our environment and humankind will just have to deal with it.
.
Why Plandemic Was Censored and Removed!
I don’t know and don’t think anybody else does either… at least not yet. What concerns me is not the virus itself but the longer-term effects the virus will have on society. Will this virus present a new challenge for us to overcome or will it become a tool used by those wanting to dominate and control us? Time will tell.